COMMENTARY: Anything Left in the cupboard?
Published: June 16th, 2014
“Old Mother Hubbard went to the cupboard to fetch her poor dog a bone. When she got there, the cupboard was bare, so the poor little doggie had none.” Historians differ on the origin of this nursery rhyme.
What is clear is that “The Comic Adventures of Old Mother Hubbard and Her Dog,” by Sarah Catherine Martin, first appeared in print in London around 1805.
Taken at face value, it was a whimsical literary concoction about an elderly woman who thought she had set aside adequate sustenance for her dog. When the need arose, she went to the secure location where the bone was stored, only to find that it had been removed. Alas, the pup would not be eating.
Oklahomans who want adequate roads, bridges, schools, fire protection and other essential public services are finding themselves in the same condition as the dog. Tax revenues that are intended for the common good of our citizens are missing, absconded, or simply repurposed under any of a number of theories of economic principles.
Ms. Hubbard may have been surprised when the cupboard was empty, but Oklahomans shouldn’t be when they realize that the state is actually giving away MORE in corporate tax credits and refunds than it is receiving in corporate income tax.
According to a story in the Journal Record on June 11, because of “continued shortfalls” in corporate income tax collections, Oklahoma’s General Revenue Fund collections last month were down nearly $6 million from a year ago and were more than $25 million short of the official estimates of the governor’s staff.
Ironically, while Oklahoma collected $9.1 million in corporate income taxes in May, NONE of it reached the state’s general fund because corporate tax refunds totaled $15.4 million. How can anyone be surprised that the budget has a gaping hole when the state gives away 169 percent of what it receives?
That means in one month alone, $6.3 million of non-corporate income tax revenue subsidized Oklahoma’s liability for tax credits, tax deferrals and refunds, and had to be added to the $9.1 million collected and rebated back in the form of refunds.
In an “Oklahoma Watch” article published in the Journal Record on June 10, Warren Veith reported, “This year’s corporate tax collections have fallen so far below expectations that the state came within a hair’s breadth of declaring a ‘revenue failure’ that, in turn, would have triggered across the board cuts in scores of state programs.”
Veith reported that “officials say the state has contributed to the problem by creating a smorgasbord of tax credits over the years, suspending some of them temporarily to boost recession-era budgets, reinstating them later, allowing prior-year refunds and failing to accurately gauge the impact of all the changes.”
Through the first 11 months of the fiscal year, corporate income tax collections are $135.4 million below prior year collections and a whopping $151 million below the estimate. With $188 million less to meet the recurring obligations of our state government, the crafters of this year’s budget took the novel approach of proposing an income tax cut.
State Auditor and Inspector Gary Jones says he expects corporate tax collections to remain volatile and to potentially decline over time as companies continue to pressure lawmakers to extend tax credits and incentives.
Now in all fairness, Oklahoma would not be the home of the Thunder franchise if not for the oil and gas industry and tax credits. Oklahoma City’s Bricktown district and corresponding Oklahoma River district would not be the jewel of OKC without tax incentive financing.
However . . .
According to Auditor Jones, “. . . a lot of the decisions we’re making in Oklahoma City tend to be more based on campaign contributions and lobbyists’ concerns than they are on what’s in the best interest of the citizens of Oklahoma.”
Editor’s Note: A Democrat, David Perryman serves state House District 56 at the state Capitol.